Comments on: IA at IWMW http://consequencing.com/2007/07/18/ia-at-iwmw/ user experience research and design - navopia.co.uk Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:56:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Yvonne http://consequencing.com/2007/07/18/ia-at-iwmw/#comment-1422 Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:21:09 +0000 http://consequencing.com/2007/07/18/ia-at-iwmw/#comment-1422 OK, watched it all now – so where is this IA community of practice, and how do I join?

]]> By: Yvonne http://consequencing.com/2007/07/18/ia-at-iwmw/#comment-1417 Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:56:12 +0000 http://consequencing.com/2007/07/18/ia-at-iwmw/#comment-1417 My job title is Web developer and usability consultant, but whilst I aspire to be an information architect, I don’t think I could call myself one yet! Just watching your IWMW presentation now, it’s very good.

]]> By: Andrew Stewart http://consequencing.com/2007/07/18/ia-at-iwmw/#comment-48 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:01:05 +0000 http://consequencing.com/2007/07/18/ia-at-iwmw/#comment-48 Hi,

Firstly I’d just like to say that this presentation was entertaining, inspiring and overall pretty damn awesome!

I’m not sure if I’ve got this correct but I felt there could be a lot of potential for collaboration here with records managers. They are beginning to discuss information in a wider sense now with regards to the introduction of web 2.0 and I thought a little joined up thinking to ensure information structures (structured or unstructured – seems to be an ongoing argument which I’ll not get into here) are correct below the user interface would go a long way to making it easier in terms of the overall information architecture. We (as web managers) could then input into the policies that are created by them and help them to understand the processes we go through to create and provide this information, giving a more joined up way of thinking.

Cheers

Andy

]]>